Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jannah domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/Filmymantra.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jannah domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/Filmymantra.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/Filmymantra.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Jacqueline Fernandez’s Lawyer Defends Her in Money Laundering Case - Filmymantra
News & Gossip

Jacqueline Fernandez’s Lawyer Defends Her in Money Laundering Case

Jacqueline Fernandez’s Lawyer Defends Her in Sukesh Chandrashekhar Money Laundering Case

Actress Jacqueline Fernandez, entangled in the ₹200 crore money laundering case linked to conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar, continues to deny allegations of involvement. Her lawyer argued before the Delhi High Court that she was unaware of Sukesh’s criminal activities and cannot be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).


Defense: Lack of Knowledge of Illicit Activities

Jacqueline’s lawyer, Senior Advocate Siddharth Agarwal, contended that she received gifts from Sukesh without knowing their illegal origins. As per PMLA, a person can only be prosecuted if they knowingly derive economic advantage from a listed offense, which her counsel asserted was not the case.

The defense emphasized that Jacqueline’s actions did not constitute participation in Sukesh’s alleged crime syndicate. The actress had no knowledge that the money used for the gifts came from extortion activities.


Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) Response Pending

The Enforcement Directorate (ED), which filed the charge sheet against Jacqueline, will present its arguments on December 3. Justice Anish Dayal has scheduled the next hearing to review the submissions.


Legal Arguments

The defense referred to previous judgments, including Vijay Madanlal Chaudhary’s case, to highlight that attached properties during investigations are not necessarily proceeds of crime. Jacqueline’s lawyers also pointed out that she is a witness in the extortion case against Sukesh under MCOCA and cannot be prosecuted for the same offense under different charges.


Challenging the Charge Sheet

Jacqueline has challenged the ED’s charge sheet, asserting she was unaware of the illicit origins of the gifts. The case involves Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s alleged ₹200 crore extortion racket, in which several high-profile figures have been implicated.


This legal battle continues to be a significant chapter in Jacqueline Fernandez’s ongoing fight to clear her name. The upcoming hearing will determine the next course of action in this high-profile case.

Related Articles

Back to top button